Skip to main content
A task is the unit of work Tilebox runners execute. A task class defines the code to run, the input fields that are serialized with each task submission, and optional relationships to other tasks through subtasks and dependencies. Tasks can run as the root task of a job or as subtasks submitted by another task. This lets a workflow build a dynamic task graph while Tilebox schedules eligible tasks across runners in the selected cluster.

Creating a Task

To create a task in Tilebox, define a class that extends the Task base class and implements the execute method. The execute method is the entry point for the task where its logic is defined. It’s called when the task is executed.
This example demonstrates a simple task that prints “Hello World!” to the console. For python, the key components of this task are:
MyFirstTask is a subclass of the Task class, which serves as the base class for all defined tasks. It provides the essential structure for a task. Inheriting from Task automatically makes the class a dataclass, which is useful for specifying inputs. Additionally, by inheriting from Task, the task is automatically assigned an identifier based on the class name.
The execute method is the entry point for executing the task. This is where the task’s logic is defined. It’s invoked by a runner when the task runs and performs the task’s operation.
The context argument is an ExecutionContext instance that provides access to an API for submitting new tasks as part of the same job, task logging, custom tracing, and features like shared caching.
For Go, the key components are:
MyFirstTask is a struct that implements the Task interface. It represents the task to be executed.
The Execute method is the entry point for executing the task. This is where the task’s logic is defined. It’s invoked by a runner when the task runs and performs the task’s operation.
The code samples on this page do not illustrate how to execute the task. That will be covered in the next section on runners. The reason for that is that executing tasks is a separate concern from implementing tasks.

Input Parameters

Tasks often require input parameters to operate. These inputs can range from simple values to complex data structures. By inheriting from the Task class, the task is treated as a Python dataclass, allowing input parameters to be defined as class attributes.
Tasks must be serializable to JSON or to protobuf because they may be distributed across a cluster of runners.
In Go, task parameters must be exported fields of the task struct (starting with an uppercase letter), otherwise they will not be serialized to JSON.
Supported types for input parameters include:
  • Basic types such as str, int, float, bool
  • Lists and dictionaries of basic types
  • Nested data classes that are also JSON-serializable or protobuf-serializable

Task Composition and subtasks

Until now, tasks have performed only a single operation. But tasks can be more powerful. Tasks can submit other tasks as subtasks. This allows for a modular workflow design, breaking down complex operations into simpler, manageable parts. Additionally, the execution of subtasks is automatically parallelized whenever possible.
In this example, a ParentTask submits ChildTask tasks as subtasks. The number of subtasks to be submitted is based on the num_subtasks attribute of the ParentTask. The submit_subtask method takes an instance of a task as its argument, meaning the task to be submitted must be instantiated with concrete parameters first. Parent task do not have access to results of subtasks, instead, tasks can use shared caching to share data between tasks.
By submitting a task as a subtask, its execution is scheduled as part of the same job as the parent task. Compared to just directly invoking the subtask’s execute method, this allows the subtask’s execution to occur on a different machine or in parallel with other subtasks. To learn more about how tasks are executed, see the section on runners.

Larger subtasks example

A practical workflow example showcasing task composition might help illustrate the capabilities of tasks. Below is an example of a set of tasks forming a workflow capable of downloading a set number of random dog images from the internet. The Dog API can be used to get the image URLs, and then download them. Implementing this using Task Composition could look like this:
This example consists of the following tasks:
DownloadRandomDogImages fetches a specific number of random dog image URLs from an API. It then submits a DownloadImage task for each received image URL.
DownloadImage downloads an image from a specified URL and saves it to a file.
Together, these tasks create a workflow that downloads random dog images from the internet. The relationship between the two tasks and their formation as a workflow becomes clear when DownloadRandomDogImages submits DownloadImage tasks as subtasks. Visualizing the execution of such a workflow is akin to a tree structure where the DownloadRandomDogImages task is the root, and the DownloadImage tasks are the leaves. For instance, when downloading five random dog images, the following tasks are executed.
Download Dog Images Workflow
In total, six tasks are executed: the DownloadRandomDogImages task and five DownloadImage tasks. The DownloadImage tasks can execute in parallel, as they are independent. If more than one runner is available, the Tilebox Workflow Orchestrator automatically parallelizes the execution of these tasks.
Check out job_client.display to learn how this visualization was automatically generated from the task executions.

Task States

Every task goes through a set of states during its lifetime.
  • When submitted, either as a job or as a subtask, it starts in the QUEUED state and transitions to RUNNING when a runner picks it up.
  • If the task executes successfully, it transitions to COMPUTED.
  • If the task fails, it transitions to FAILED, unless it’s an optional task, or nested within an optional task, in which case it transitions to FAILED_OPTIONAL.
  • As soon as all subtasks of a task are COMPUTED (or FAILED_OPTIONAL), the task is considered COMPLETED, allowing dependent tasks to be executed.
The table below summarizes the different task states and their meanings.
Task States

Map-Reduce Pattern

Often times the input to a task is a list, with elements that should then be mapped to individual subtasks, whose results are later aggregated in a reduce step. This pattern is commonly known as MapReduce and a common pattern in workflows. In Tilebox, the reduce step is typically defined as a separate task that depends on all the map tasks. For example, the workflow below applies this pattern to a list of numbers to calculate the sum of all squares of the numbers. The Square task takes a single number and squares it, and the Sum task reduces the list of squared numbers to a single sum.
Submitting a job of the SumOfSquares task and running it with a runner can be done as follows:
Logs
Sum of squares workflow using the map-reduce pattern

Recursive subtasks

Tasks can not only submit other tasks as subtasks, but also instances of themselves. This allows for a recursive breakdown of a task into smaller chunks. Such recursive decomposition algorithms are referred to as divide and conquer algorithms. For example, the RecursiveTask below is a valid task that submits smaller instances of itself as subtasks.
When implementing a recursive task, it’s important to define a base case that stops the recursion. Otherwise, the task will keep submitting subtasks indefinitely, resulting in an infinite loop.

Recursive subtask example

An example for this is the random dog images workflow mentioned earlier. In the previous implementation, downloading images was already parallelized. But the initial orchestration of the individual download tasks was not parallelized, because DownloadRandomDogImages was responsible for fetching all random dog image URLs and only submitted the individual download tasks once all URLs were retrieved. For a large number of images this setup can bottleneck the entire workflow. To improve this, recursive subtask submission decomposes a DownloadRandomDogImages task with a high number of images into two smaller DownloadRandomDogImages tasks, each fetching half. This process can be repeated until a specified threshold is met, at which point the Dog API can be queried directly for image URLs. That way, image downloads start as soon as the first URLs are retrieved, without initial waiting. An implementation of this recursive submission may look like this:
With this implementation, downloading a large number of images (for example, 9) results in the following tasks being executed:
Download Dog Images Workflow implemented recursively

Retry Handling

By default, when a task fails to execute, it’s marked as failed. In some cases, it may be useful to retry the task multiple times before marking it as a failure. This is particularly useful for tasks dependent on external services that might be temporarily unavailable. Tilebox Workflows allows you to specify the number of retries for a task using the max_retries argument of the submit_subtask method. Check out the example below to see how this might look like in practice.
A failed task may be picked up by any available runner and not necessarily the same one that it failed on.

Dependencies

Tasks often rely on other tasks. For example, a task that processes data might depend on a task that fetches that data. Tasks can express their dependencies on other tasks by using the depends_on argument of the submit_subtask method. This means that a dependent task will only execute after the task it relies on has successfully completed.
The depends_on argument accepts a list of tasks, enabling a task to depend on multiple other tasks.
A workflow with dependencies might look like this:
The RootTask submits three PrintTask tasks as subtasks. These tasks depend on each other, meaning the second task executes only after the first task has successfully completed, and the third only executes after the second completes. The tasks are executed sequentially.
If a task upon which another task depends submits subtasks, those subtasks must also execute before the dependent task begins execution.

Dependencies Example

A practical example is a workflow that fetches news articles from an API and processes them using the News API.
Logs
Process News Workflow
This workflow consists of four tasks: An important aspect is that there is no dependency between the PrintHeadlines and MostFrequentAuthors tasks. This means they can execute in parallel, which the Tilebox Workflow Orchestrator will do, provided multiple runners are available.
In this example, the results from FetchNews are stored in a file. This is not the recommended method for passing data between tasks. When executing on a distributed cluster, the existence of a file written by a dependent task cannot be guaranteed. Instead, it’s better to use a shared cache.

Optional Tasks

By default, if any task in a job fails (after exhausting all retries), the entire job is marked as failed and all remaining queued tasks are canceled. In some workflows though, certain tasks are not critical. Their failure should not prevent the rest of the job from completing. For these cases, you can mark a subtask as optional. An optional task has the following behavior:
  • If it succeeds, the job continues as normal, there is no difference from a regular task.
  • If it fails, the job is not canceled. Instead:
    • The failed task is marked with the state FAILED_OPTIONAL instead of FAILED.
    • Tasks that depend on the optional task still execute, even though the optional task failed.
    • The parent task and the rest of the job continue as normal.
Some scenarios where optional tasks are useful are:
  • Data enrichment: A task responsible for fetching auxiliary data that is not critical for the job to complete.
  • Reporting: If a task is a notification or logging task, its failure should not prevent the rest of the job from completing.
  • Fault tolerance: If a task is known to be flaky and may fail intermittently, marking it as optional can help ensure the job continues to make progress.
  • Aggregation workflows: If a workflow is composed of multiple independent subtasks, and an aggregation task summarizing the results, not every subtask needs to succeed for the aggregation task to run.
  • Cleanup tasks: If certain tasks need to always run at the end of a job, for example to send a notification, or to clean up temporary resources, marking the job tasks as optional ensures they always run.
Optional tasks can be combined with retry handling. An optional task is only marked as FAILED_OPTIONAL after all retries have been exhausted. For example, context.submit_subtask(FlakyTask(), optional=True, max_retries=3) will retry up to 3 times before being treated as a failed optional task.

Submitting Optional Tasks

To mark a subtask as optional, use the optional parameter when submitting it:
In this example, FlakyTask is submitted as an optional subtask. If it fails, FinalTask still executes because it depends on an optional task. The job completes successfully. A visualization of such a job is shown below.
Optional Subtasks Workflow

Nested Optional Tasks

When an optional task itself submits subtasks, those subtasks, and also their subtasks recursively, are also considered optional. If any of those tasks fail, all remaining queued tasks that are nested within the same optional root task are automatically skipped. This ensures that the failure does not propagate beyond the optional boundary and the parent job continues normally.
In this example, Step1B fails. Since it’s an indirect subtask of the optional Processing subtask, both Step1C and Step2 are skipped and AlwaysRuns still executes. The job completes successfully.
Optional Subtree Workflow
If instead Step1B was also marked as optional, Step1C and Step2 would still be executed, and only after that AlwaysRuns would execute. This means that optional subtasks can have other optional subtasks nested within them.
Optional Subtree Workflow

Task Identifiers

A task identifier is a unique string used by the Tilebox Workflow Orchestrator to identify the task. It’s used by runners to map submitted tasks to a task class and execute them. It also serves as the default name in execution visualizations. If unspecified, the identifier of a task defaults to the class name. For instance, the identifier of the PrintHeadlines task in the previous example is "PrintHeadlines". This is good for prototyping, but not recommended for production, as changing the class name also changes the identifier, which can lead to issues during refactoring. It also prevents different tasks from sharing the same class name. To address this, Tilebox Workflows offers a way to explicitly specify the identifier of a task. This is done by overriding the identifier method of the Task class. This method should return a unique string identifying the task. This decouples the task’s identifier from its class name, allowing you to change the identifier without renaming the class. It also allows tasks with the same class name to have different identifiers. The identifier method can also specify a version number for the task—see the section on semantic versioning below for more details.
In python, the identifier method must be defined as either a classmethod or a staticmethod, meaning it can be called without instantiating the class.

Semantic Versioning

As seen in the previous section, the identifier method can return a tuple of two strings, where the first string is the identifier and the second string is the version number. This allows for semantic versioning of tasks. Versioning is important for managing changes to a task’s execution method. It allows for new features, bug fixes, and changes while ensuring existing workflows operate as expected. Additionally, it enables multiple versions of a task to coexist, enabling gradual rollout of changes without interrupting production deployments. You assign a version number by overriding the identifier method of the task class. It must return a tuple of two strings: the first is the identifier and the second is the version number, which must match the pattern vX.Y (where X and Y are non-negative integers). X is the major version number and Y is the minor version. For example, this task has the identifier "tilebox.com/example_workflow/MyTask" and the version "v1.3":
When a task is submitted as part of a job, the version from which it’s submitted is recorded and may differ from the version on the runner executing the task. When runners execute a task, they require a registered task with a matching identifier and compatible version number. A compatible version is where the major version number on the runner matches that of the submitted task, and the minor version number on the runner is equal to or greater than that of the submitted task. Examples of compatible version numbers include:
  • MyTask is submitted as part of a job. The version is "v1.3".
  • A runner with version "v1.3" of MyTask would execute this task.
  • A runner with version "v1.5" of MyTask would also execute this task.
  • A runner with version "v1.2" of MyTask would not execute this task, as its minor version is lower than that of the submitted task.
  • A runner with version "v2.5" of MyTask would not execute this task, as its major version differs from that of the submitted task.

Conclusion

Tasks form the foundation of Tilebox Workflows. By understanding how to create and manage tasks, you can leverage Tilebox’s capabilities to automate and optimize your workflows. Experiment with defining your own tasks, utilizing subtasks, managing dependencies, and employing semantic versioning to develop robust and efficient workflows.